Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Ir J Med Sci ; 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines, supported by large, well-designed studies, suggest that bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment for adolescents living with severe obesity to improve health and psychosocial functioning. The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and referral practices of general practitioners (GPs) and paediatricians in Ireland. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was circulated online to practising paediatricians and GPs. The survey consisted of a short introduction about childhood obesity and 12 questions on adolescent bariatric surgery and obesity medications. RESULTS: There were 45 unique responses to the survey from 22 GPs (48%), 8 paediatricians (17%), and 15 others. Most GPs (72%) would not consider referring an adolescent for bariatric surgery. Paediatricians were significantly more likely to refer (72% vs. 28%, p = 0.034). A minimum BMI of 40 kg/m2 was the most common response, which GPs (45%) and paediatricians (37.5%) suggested should be a pre-requisite for surgery. There was strong support for family psychological assessment and a reported deficit in the community support needed to manage obesity. GPs were more likely than paediatricians to respond that anti-obesity medications should be made available to adolescents, specifically liraglutide (45% vs. 25%), semaglutide (45% vs. 37.5%), and orlistat (22% vs. 0%). DISCUSSION: There is a reluctance among GPs to refer adolescents with severe obesity for consideration of bariatric surgery. Concerns regarding the different obesity treatments held by medical professionals should be addressed through education and engagement and should be fundamental to the development of child and adolescent obesity services.

2.
Dig Surg ; 41(1): 1-11, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Debate exists regarding the optimal treatment for painful chronic pancreatitis (CP). This meta-analysis aims to determine the outcomes of surgical intervention as compared to endoscopy in patients with painful CP. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Databases (1995 onwards) was done by two independent reviewers using PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome was pain relief. RESULTS: Among 8,479 studies, three were randomized trials, comprising a total of 199 patients. Compared with endoscopy, surgery was associated with a lower Izbicki score, both at medium term (mean difference (MD) 21.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.48-29.43, p < 0.00001) and long term (MD: 17.80, 95% CI: 8.36-27.23, p = 0.0002). A higher proportion of surgical patients had some sort of pain relief compared with those who had endoscopy, both at medium term (72% vs. 46%, RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.90, p = 0.0006) and long term (73% vs. 47%, RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.19-1.89, p = 0.0007). Complete pain relief was more common in the surgical group compared to the endoscopy group, both at medium term (33% vs. 17%, RR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.16-3.36, p = 0.01) and long term (35% vs. 18%, RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.15-3.20, p = 0.01). The pooled crossover rate from endoscopy to surgery was 22% (22/99). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment in patients with painful CP leads to better pain control, requiring fewer interventions as compared to endoscopic treatment.


Subject(s)
Pain , Pancreatitis, Chronic , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Pain/etiology , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Pain Management , Pancreatitis, Chronic/complications , Pancreatitis, Chronic/surgery
3.
Ir J Med Sci ; 193(2): 903-908, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728725

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antidepressant medication can be associated with weight gain. Consideration should be given to the specific agent prescribed to optimize bariatric surgery outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate if patients treated with antidepressants stratified by risk of weight gain are associated with less weight loss at 1 year postbariatric surgery. METHOD: A single centre, retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between July 2018 and 2021 within St Vincent's University Hospital group. The exposure was antidepressant use, stratified for risk of weight gain, and the control group was patients who underwent surgery but no antidepressant use. The primary outcome was % TWL (total weight loss) at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to estimate the impact of antidepressant treatment on post-surgery weight loss at 12 months using the variables of age, gender and pre-operative BMI. RESULTS: Of the total cohort (n = 315), 70 patients (22.2%) were taking antidepressants. At 12 months, post-operatively patients taking medium risk for weight gain antidepressants had significantly less mean %TWL compared to those not taking antidepressants (p = 0.015). Overall, taking any antidepressant was not found to be a significant predictor of %TWL at 12 months after surgery (ß = - 2.590, p = 0.0836). CONCLUSION: Many patients undergoing bariatric surgery have concurrent psychiatric conditions. Given the complex relationship between bariatric surgery and mental health, psychotropic medications may be best managed by a specialist in the field such as a bariatric psychiatrist in order to optimize patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Weight Loss , Weight Gain , Treatment Outcome
4.
Injury ; 54(2): 469-480, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36323600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The physiological abnormalities relating to obesity and metabolic syndrome can contribute to worse outcomes following trauma especially in class 2 and 3 obesity. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether patients with a higher class of obesity who suffer traumatic injury have a higher risk of worse outcomes including in-hospital mortality than normal-weight patients. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and CINAHL was performed for studies that reported a comparison of in-hospital obesity-related outcomes against normal-weight individuals aged 15 years and older following trauma. Single or multiple injuries from either blunt and/or penetrating trauma were included. Burn-related injuries, isolated head injury and studies focusing on orthopaedic related perioperative complications were excluded. RESULTS: The search yielded 7405 articles; 26 were included in this systematic review. 945,511 patients had a BMI>30. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for analysis of all four outcomes. Patients with class 3 obesity (BMI>40) have significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality than normal-BMI individuals following blunt and penetrating trauma (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.39-2.19, p=<0.00001), significantly longer hospital LOS (SMD, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.21-0.25; p<0.00001) and significantly longer ICU LOS (SMD, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12-0.26; p<0.0001). In contrast, studies that examined blunt and penetrating trauma and classified obesity with a threshold of BMI>30 found no significant difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.02, p=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients living with class 3 obesity following trauma when compared with individuals with normal BMI. The management of patients with obesity is complex and trauma systems should develop specific weight related pathways to manage and anticipate the complications that arise in these patients. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO registration: CRD42021234482 Level of Evidence: Level 3.


Subject(s)
Obesity , Wounds, Penetrating , Humans , Obesity/complications , Body Mass Index
5.
J Surg Res ; 280: 226-233, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36007481

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Routine outpatient follow-up visits for surgical patients are a source of strain on health-care resources and patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic adding a new urgency to finding the safest follow-up arrangement, text message follow-up might prove an acceptable alternative to a phone call or an in-person clinic visit. METHODS: An open-label, three-arm, parallel randomized trial was conducted. The interventions were traditional in-person appointment, a telephone call, or a text message. The primary outcome was the number of postdischarge complications identified. The secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction with follow-up, future preference, default to follow-up, and preference to receiving medical information by text message. RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients underwent randomization: 50 in the in-person group, 80 in the telephone group, and 78 in the text message group. There was no difference in the number of reported complications: 5 (10%) patients in the in-person group, 7 (9%) patients in the text group, and 11 (14%) patients in the telephone group (P = 0.613). The preferred method of follow-up was by telephone (106, 61.6%). The least preferred was the in-person follow-up (15, 8.7%, P = 0.002), which also had the highest default rate (44%). CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that text messages and telephone calls are unsafe and ineffective methods of follow-up. Although most patients are happy to receive results by text message, the majority of patients would prefer a telephone follow-up and are less likely to default by this method. Health-care systems should develop telehealth initiatives when planning health-care services in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Text Messaging , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Outpatients , Aftercare , Pandemics , Patient Discharge , Telephone
6.
Front Oncol ; 12: 821159, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35265523

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: Mucinous colorectal cancer has traditionally been associated with high rates of recurrence and poor long-term survival. There is limited published data on outcomes for patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic mucinous colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathological outcomes for patients with mucinous colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) undergoing liver resection to a matched group of patients with adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) and to evaluate the accurary of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at detecting the presence of mucin in liver metastases. Materials and Methods: Patients with mucinous CRCLM undergoing liver resection were matched 1:3 to patients with adenocarcinoma NOS CRCLM. Clinicopathological data from the primary tumour and metastatic lesion were collected and compared between the groups. Hepatic recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were compared between the groups. The ability of preoperative MRI to detect mucin in CRCLM was also evaluated. Results: A total of 25 patients with mucinous CRCLM underwent surgery over the 12-year period and were matched to 75 patients with adenocarcinoma NOS. Clinicopathological findings were similar between the groups. Resection of mucinous CRCLM was feasible and safe with similar levels of morbidity to adenocarcinoma NOS. There were no differences identified in hepatic recurrence-free (p=0.85), disease-free (p=0.25) and overall survival (p=0.98) between the groups. MRI had a sensitivity of 31.3% in detecting the presence of mucin in CRCLM. Conclusion: Patients with mucinous CRCLM in this study had similar outcomes to patients with adenocarcinoma NOS. Based on our findings, histological subtype should not be taken into account when deciding on resectability of CRCLM.

7.
Scand J Surg ; 111(1): 14574969221088685, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35322733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Liver resection for breast cancer liver metastases is becoming a more widely accepted therapeutic option for selected groups of patients. The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for breast cancer-related liver metastases and identify any variables associated with recurrence or survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was undertaken for the 12 year period between 2009 and 2021. Clinicopathological, treatment, intraoperative, recurrence, survival and follow-up data were collected on all patients. Kaplan-Meier methods, the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to identify variables that were associated with recurrence and survival. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients underwent 21 liver resections over the 12-year period. There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery and an operative morbidity occurred in 23.8% of cases. The median local recurrence free survival and disease free survival times were both 50 months, while the 5 year overall survival rate was 65%. The presence of extrahepatic metastases were associated with a decreased time to local recurrence (p < 0.01) and worse overall survival (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that liver resection for breast cancer-related liver metastases is feasible, safe and associated with prolonged disease free and overall survival in selected patients. It is likely that this option will be offered to more patients going forward, however, the difficulty lies in selecting out those who will benefit from liver resection particularly given the increasing number of systemic treatments and local ablative methods available that offer good long-term results.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hepatectomy/methods , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery
8.
Am J Surg ; 222(3): 529-535, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33750573

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mucinous adenocarcinoma represents a distinct histological subtype of colorectal cancer. To date there has been limited data available for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) derived from mucinous adenocarcinoma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide data on the clinicopathological and survival outcomes of this cohort. METHODS: Databases were searched for studies comparing clinicopathological and survival outcomes between patients with mucinous CRCLM and CRCLM from adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified who underwent liver resection. A random-effects model was used for analysis. RESULTS: Eight studies describing 9157 patients were included. Mucinous CRCLM were positively associated with colon tumors (OR 1⋅64, P = 0⋅01), T3/T4 tumors (OR 1⋅58, P = 0⋅02), node positive tumors (OR 1⋅55, P = 0⋅005). The review also identified a trend towards worse overall survival in patients with mucinous CRCLM. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the distinct clinicopathological characteristics and impaired long term outcomes of mucinous CRCLM, resection should remain the gold standard where possible.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous , Colonic Neoplasms , Hepatectomy , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/secondary , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery , Age Factors , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/secondary , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/secondary , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Sex Factors
9.
J Surg Educ ; 75(4): 957-963, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29398629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To construct and pilot an educational tool to improve the quality of postoperative documentation at Mayo University Hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective data were collected from 100 consecutive patients treated surgically during October to November 2016. The first written ward based note following surgery was analyzed against RCS quality standards outlined in "Good Surgical Practice." An educational tool was then constructed to improve postoperative documentation. The mnemonic created was POST-OP-physiotherapy/mobilization, operative diagnosis, sepsis, thromboprophylaxis, oral intake/fluid balance, and pain. A second audit cycle involving 103 patients was carried out prospectively in March 2017. SETTING: Mayo University Hospital, a 330 bed teaching hospital affiliated with the National University of Ireland, Galway. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who had undergone either an elective or an emergency general surgery procedure over two 5-week periods. RESULTS: Comparing the 2 study periods, significant improvements in the quality of postoperative surgical documentation was observed. All standards improved including patient identification (17.8% vs 78.1%, p < 0.001) and name of note maker (54.7% vs 86.2%, p < 0.001). There was also improvement in the documentation of antibiotic use (23.8% vs 75.8%, p > 0.001), thromboprophylaxis (7.1% vs 75.8%, p < 0.001), analgesia (36.9% vs 74.7%, p < 0.001), operative diagnosis (66.6% vs 91.9%, p < 0.001), and mobilization (23.6% vs 78.1%, p < 0.001) following the introduction of the POST-OP tool. CONCLUSION: The design and introduction of the POST-OP education tool helped to significantly improve documentation and educate surgical residents on the essential components of postoperative care. The above data suggest that this effective mnemonic can improve the quality of postoperative documentation for surgical patients.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , General Surgery/education , Postoperative Period , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Humans , Internship and Residency , Ireland , Pilot Projects , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , United States
10.
Ir J Med Sci ; 187(4): 1029-1038, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29423825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy has for many years been the accepted treatment of appendicitis. In recent years, non-operative management of appendicitis (NOTA) has been reported as an effective treatment option. AIMS: We aimed to assess the perspectives of public hospital attendees regarding the diagnosis and treatment options for appendicitis. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of outpatients over a 10-week period (December 2016-March 2017). The questionnaire contained an information sheet and consent form and included open, closed and multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four participants (159 female, 85 male) were surveyed. A high level of awareness of appendicitis as a surgical emergency existed amongst the participants. The primary reason participants were reluctant to receive non-operative treatment was a fear of their appendix "bursting" if not removed. CONCLUSIONS: Participant knowledge levels were variable with many concerned that non-operated appendicitis would always perforate. Perceptions of treatment were variable with some believing surgery was an absolute requirement and others preferring antibiotics due to the belief that NOTA is complication-free.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/therapy , Decision Making/ethics , Appendicitis/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...